site stats

Uganda: Judges Miss Deadline for Former Prime Minister Mbabazi Judgment

Photo: The Observer

Supreme Courtroom justices Bart Katureebe and Esther Kisaakye.

Supreme Courtroom justices ignored a June 30 Deadline to unencumber their specified person judgments, Ninety days after they pushed aside on March 31 the presidential election petition filed By Way Of former Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi, challenging the outcome of the February 18 Normal election.

When he delivered the summary Judgment on March 31, chief justice Bart Katureebe stated the 9 justices of the Supreme Court would provide their unique judgments in 90 days. The Ninety days passed on June 30 and no full judgments had been released.

Asked to explain the lengthen, Chief Justice Katureebe speaking via Solomon Muyita, the judiciary’s senior communication officer, stated on July 11 that one justice, Dr Esther Mayambala Kisaakye, is ailing and in another country.

“Justice Kisaakye, a member of our panel, has been in health center in U.S. for the reason that June and was just lately operated. As soon as she will get higher and comes again, the Court Docket will set a day for delivering the distinct reasons of our March judgment,” said Muyita.

Mbabazi filed his petition on March 1, 2016, urging the Supreme Court Docket to nullify the February electoral victory of President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni citing a string of irregularities. Mbabazi’s petition was once unanimously rejected By Means Of the Supreme Courtroom justices.

In The ruling learn By Way Of justice Katureebe, the justices said Museveni, the primary respondent, was validly elected. The judges additionally refused to order a vote recount In The Forty Four districts where Mbabazi alleged huge rigging.

However, one attorney who did some work on the Mbabazi petition told us on July 11 that from what she is aware of, the mentioned judgments are usually not ready.

“The Court appears not to have convincing grounds to deliver; that is why they do not care writing the grounds. If Justice Kisaakye is in poor health, that’s dangerous information However time will inform whether or not this Court Docket has grounds to desk,” she stated.

Muyita, Alternatively, insists the special judgments are prepared. Interviewed for a comment on July 12, Mbabazi’s lead petition attorney Mohmed Mbabazi mentioned the precise judgment is only a postmortem, which does no longer lend a hand his shopper.

“We still imagine we proved a case Within The Supreme Court Docket and if there was an opportunity of appealing that verdict, it would were overturned But that is the easiest Court Docket In The land,” Mbabazi mentioned.

However FDC President Maj Gen Mugisha Muntu stated on July 10 that what the nation wants is an independent audit of the February 18 Normal election, no longer the designated grounds for brushing aside the petition as a result of his birthday party nonetheless believes its candidate, Kizza Besigye, received that election.

In pushing aside the Mbabazi petition, the Supreme Court justices mentioned Mbabazi, a 3rd-position finisher Within The election, filed affidavits from people who may no longer be believed Via Court Docket; for example, those purporting to be contributors of the Kifeesi (felony) crew. The Previous prime was once additionally faulted for not bringing proof to prove that Museveni bribed voters.

“Most of his evidence was once in keeping with rumour. He had no proof that his supporters have been intimidated and that it was the primary respondent who sanctioned the intimidations. He had no big proof to pin the Electoral Fee on noncompliance with electoral laws,” the Supreme Courtroom unanimously ruled.

On the problem of non-compliance, Courtroom reiterated that there used to be no proof to in an instant hyperlink the confirmed circumstances of non-compliance to Museveni adding that failure to conform does not automatically lead to annulment of an election.

“There used to be non-compliance However we’re not satisfied it affected the leads to a considerable manner,” Katureebe said.

Court additionally ruled that the petitioner didn’t adduce proof to show that he sought and was once denied equal media protection. Court Docket also stated a document By African Heart for Media Excellence (ACME) that confirmed that the new Imaginative And Prescient gave fair protection to all candidates.

Court, Then Again, faulted the EC for leaving out results from 1,777 polling stations on declaration day. The petition was instituted underneath the Presidential Elections Act (PEA) towards Museveni, EC and the Lawyer Common for noncompliance with the PEA and the constitutional mandate.

One Of The offences Mbabazi accused Museveni of committing included voter bribery, intimidation, making derogatory statements against opponents, use of state tools without correct authorization, meting out violence on supporters of his opponents and battle mongering.

He accused EC of failing to properly collect a national voters’ register, retiring the earlier register illegally, illegally nominating Museveni, giving preferential remedy to Museveni, delayed delivery of polling materials, chasing away of different candidates’ polling sellers from polling stations, allowing people to vote before and after polling time and allowing the graduation of the polls with pre-ticketed ballot papers.

The EC on February 20 declared Museveni winner with 60.7 p.c of votes cast, followed By Kizza Besigye (35.Three %) and Mbabazi (1.Forty Three p.c). The Opposite justices on the panel had been Jotham Tumwesigye, Stella Arach-Amoko, Kisaakye, Augustine Nshimye, Eldad Mwangusya, Rubby Opio-Aweri, Religion Mwondha, and Dr Lillian Tebatemwa-Ekirikubinza.

Source hyperlink

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » appearance » Widgets » and move a widget into Advertise Widget Zone