site stats

Uganda: Presidential Age Limit Key to Ruling Party Push for Reforms

Picture: The Observer

President Museveni greets Kasule Lumumba on arrival at Kyankwanzi.

The shock push By Means Of the NRM for constitutional reforms, which it deliberately stifled last year, is a deceptive manoeuvre Via the ruling Celebration to muscle via parliament the lifting of the Seventy Five-12 months presidential age Limit, the opposition has said.

The age-Limit is the one hurdle in President Museveni’s course for re-election in 2021 after his fifth expires. On July Four, the Kyankwanzi district NRM conference took the lead and handed a decision urging its MPs to move a motion in Parliament for the modification of Article 102 (b) of the structure, which caps the maximum age for one to be elected president at Seventy Five.

“The Rationale for this push is, the district convention passed a 5-year strategic plan and members feel that the plan can most effective be accomplished with peace and security prevailing within the u . s . a ., and that peace and security are attributed to the leadership of President Museveni,” Ann Maria Nankabirwa, the district’s NRM chairperson, advised The Observer on Saturday.

Nankabirwa can be the district’s Woman MP. The motion used to be moved Through Rafael Muwonge, a district councilor for the aged, and seconded By Means Of Ntwetwe MP Joel Ssebikaali, the LC-V chairman Leopold Ddamulira Kinene and Samuel Mugyenyi, the NRM chairman for Kyankwanzi sub-county.

Nankabirwa will now ahead the decision to Museveni, the NRM chairman, ahead of it may be debated Via the Party’s top coverage organ, the Primary Government Committee (CEC).

“We Are in the meantime going to sit down as MPs from the district to forge a method forward for the reason that guide to us is to desk it [resolution] in Parliament,” Nankabirwa.

Innocent Kamusiime (Butemba county) is the opposite MP from the district which had three polling stations voting 100% for President Museveni. Total, the district voted 79.2 percent for NRM within the February 18 Normal election. Agitation for a 3rd time period for the president throughout the ruling Birthday Celebration started out in identical type in 2005 Through campaigners comparable to James Kakooza, MP for Kabula.

Even If Nankabirwa insisted that theirs was an Innocent transfer without any nudging from larger- ups, the shadow lawyer Basic Wilfred Niwagaba (Ndorwa East) in a contemporary interview told this writer that the opposition had learnt that in pushing for the amendments, NRM targeted to dispose of the Seventy Five-age Limit.

STORMY ASSEMBLY

“It is one of the amendments that President Museveni is interested by, he does no longer see himself alive when he isn’t a president,” Niwagaba said.

The proposal to amend Article 102(b), which caps the maximum age for one to be elected president at 75, was once speculated to be a part of final year’s amendments However was eliminated after a stormy cabinet ASSEMBLY on March 20, 2015. (See: First woman foils age Restrict plot, The Observer, March 27, 2015).

Museveni turns Seventy Two this year, which suggests he’s going to clock the constitutional 75 yr age cap mid-manner his current time period and, due to this fact, shall be ineligible to stand for the 2021 elections.

Imparting a paper on Parliamentary apply and procedure at a latest induction route for individuals of the Tenth Parliament, Niwagaba drew the MPs’ consideration to Articles 75 and 79 of the structure, which require lawmakers to legislate for good governance.

“If we eliminate the age Restrict and [already with] no time period limits, it signifies that we are actually legislating for life presidency for an individual, so as to definitely be a subrogation of the constitutional intentions of all [aspects] of excellent governance,” Niwagaba said.

Privately, NRM MPs talk about strikes to eliminate the age Limit However openly Birthday Celebration leaders deny such plans exist. Actually at a submit-2016-election conference for political Birthday Party leaders and members of civil society businesses (CSOs) under the auspices of the inter-Celebration organization for talk (IPOD) on June 23, NRM Secretary Normal Kasule Lulumba, conversing on behalf of the Top Minister Ruhakana Rugunda, introduced her voice to calls for the tabling of constitutional amendments early so that there is enough time for Parliament to enact related rules that operationalise such amendments.

“Whatever constitutional amendments [being planned] must come early so that there is sufficient time for the chief to deliver bills to be able to operationalise the different amendments to the constitution, and on the same time [give enough time to the relevant] institutions to devise the way to put into effect the amendments,” Lumumba mentioned all the way through the 2-day conference at Royal Suites, Bugolobi, a metropolis suburb.

A invoice to amend the constitution was once listed among the more than 20 payments that executive intends to desk in the 10th Parliament. Once tabled, it’s going to be the fourth modification to the 1995 structure.

MISTAKEN TIMING

Consistent With Lumumba, the bulk of the amendments that executive intends to introduce are drawn from proposals that were recommended By various political actors in the run-up to the lately concluded General elections.

The reforms By Using opposition political parties and civil society companies, CSOs, are contained within the Electorate’ compact on free and fair elections. They incorporated; the return of a two-time period presidential Limit, institution of an unbiased electoral Fee, separation of the state from the ruling Party and the removal of army and workers MPs from Parliament.

Except For renaming the Electoral Commission (EC), none of the proposals were included in the bill that was tabled sooner than Parliament late ultimate year. FDC secretary Normal Nathan Nandala-Mafabi accused the NRM of dishonesty.

“Here [in IPOD], we had agreed on reforms, [and] NRM was properly represented; we went and offered them to the Felony and Parliamentary affairs committee But when it came to making the law on constitutional amendments and the Parliamentary [plus] Presidential elections Acts, our colleagues from the NRM abandoned us,” Mafabi mentioned all over the IPOD conference on June 23.

However Lumumba jumped to NRM’s protection, saying the opposition’s proposed reforms came on the MISTAKEN time.

“There Have Been challenges, as a result of at the time government [opened a window] for considering the amendments By Way Of the related establishments, we did not have sufficient time,” Lumumba said.

She stated even the federal government amendments that were unexpectedly-pushed thru Parliament weren’t applied since the relevant establishments didn’t have enough time to position in situation mechanisms, constructions and finances for the implementation.

“To keep away from [wrong timing], let’s put force on government to guarantee that constitutional amendments are achieved in time,” Lumumba stated.

“As a person who has been in Parliament for the last 15 years, executive has been bringing constitutional amendments against the tip and yet we now have an article in the structure [that requires that amendments], will need to have an enabling law,” Lumumba introduced.

Source hyperlink

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » appearance » Widgets » and move a widget into Advertise Widget Zone